Issues and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Economic Development: Towards a Maqasid-Oriented Governance Framework

Authors

  • Mohd Adib Abd Muin Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah
  • Azizah Che Omar Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah
  • Suginam Suginam Universitas Harapan Medan, Medan

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Algorithmic Gharar, Maqasid Al-Shariah, AI Governance, Islamic Economics

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is spreading rapidly across Islamic banking, wealth management and zakat institutions, yet existing studies examine it sector by sector and rarely explain how algorithmic systems collide with core Shariah rules. In particular, the literature asserts but does not demonstrate that AI can generate gharar (prohibited contractual uncertainty), and it offers little explanation of why conventional AI governance is insufficient for Islamic institutions. This study addresses these gaps through an integrative literature review of 19 peer-reviewed sources published between 2019 and 2026, with a contextual focus on Malaysia and Indonesia, analysed thematically through the maqasid al-shariah framework. AI is found to be applied in four domains, namely Shariah compliance and governance, Islamic banking services, Islamic wealth management and Islamic social finance, and to face six clusters of challenges, of which algorithmic opacity and gharar is the most Shariah-specific. The study makes three theoretical contributions. First, it conceptualises algorithmic gharar and identifies five technical mechanisms, namely adaptive re-pricing, black-box decision rules, automated asset screening, probabilistic generative outputs and data asymmetry, through which AI can introduce uncertainty into the price, subject matter or consent of a contract, and it assesses them against the classical conditions of impermissible gharar. Second, it explains the inadequacy of conventional governance as an intersection gap: responsible-AI frameworks manage outcome risk but not contract validity, while Shariah governance reviews static products but not adaptive models. Third, it proposes a five-layer maqasid-oriented AI governance framework with a phased implementation roadmap for regulators and Shariah authorities in Malaysia and Indonesia.

References

Abd Muin, M. A., Shuib, M. S., Che Omar, A., Man @ Othman, W., Ismail, I. A., & Abdullah, S. (2025). Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Dalam Keusahawanan Islam: Peluang dan Cabaran Di Negeri Kedah: The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Entrepreneurship: Opportunities and Challenges in the State of Kedah. Online Journal of Islamic Management and Finance (OJIMF), 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22452/ojimf.v5i1 .

Alam, N., Gupta, L., & Zameni, A. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance: Digitalization, development and disruption. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24666-2.

Al-Saati, A.-R. (2003). The permissible gharar (risk) in classical Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 16(2), 3–19.

Azwar, A., Usman, A. H., & Abdullah, M. F. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and Islamic finance: A Scopus-based literature mapping through a PRISMA protocol. Journal of Islamic Law on Digital Economy and Business, 1(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.20885/JILDEB.vol1.iss1.art5.

Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2019). Shariah governance (Policy Document BNM/RH/PD 028-100). Bank Negara Malaysia.

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2025). Discussion paper on artificial intelligence in the Malaysian financial sector. Bank Negara Malaysia. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/dp-aifs25

Bawana, T. A., Mansor, F., Noordin, K., & Abdullah. (2025). Assessing the feasibility of Islamic banking robo-advisors adoption within the ASEAN Economic Community: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Syariah, 33(3), 291–328. https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol33no3.1.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1), 333–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180386

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine 'thinks': Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of maqasid al-Shariah. Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.

El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. The Journal of Finance, 77(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13090

Hasan, R., Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2020). Fintech and Islamic finance: Literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 3(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.2122.

Hassan, M. K., Rabbani, M. R., & Ali, M. A. M. (2020). Challenges for the Islamic finance and banking in post COVID era and the role of fintech. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 41(3), 93–116.

Ihyani, L., Saputra, S., Ayu, B. D. P., & Khatimah, W. S. W. (2025). Analysis of artificial intelligence implementation in Islamic banking during an era of uncertainty. Proceedings of the International Conference of Islamic Economics and Business (ICONIES), 11(1), 671–678.

Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), Article 248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

Khan, S., & Rabbani, M. R. (2021). Artificial intelligence and NLP-based chatbot for Islamic banking and finance. International Journal of Information Retrieval Research, 11(3), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIRR.2021070105.

Königstorfer, F., & Thalmann, S. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence in commercial banks: A research agenda for behavioral finance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100352.

Li, X., Zhang, D., Zeng, N., & Meng, D. (2026). How does artificial intelligence reshape bank profitability in China? Evidence from a multi-period difference-in-differences model. International Journal of Financial Studies, 14(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs14020039

Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., & Zhang, G. (2019). Learning under concept drift: A review. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31(12), 2346–2363. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2876857

Meero, A. (2025). Islamic vs. conventional banking in the age of FinTech and AI: Evolving business models, efficiency, and stability (2020–2024). International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13030148

Mhlanga, D. (2020). Industry 4.0 in finance: The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on digital financial inclusion. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8030045.

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. (2024). National guidelines on artificial intelligence governance and ethics (AIGE). Government of Malaysia.

Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.

Mohamed, H., & Ali, H. (2019). Blockchain, fintech, and Islamic finance: Building the future in the new Islamic digital economy. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781547400966.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). Tata kelola kecerdasan artifisial perbankan Indonesia [Artificial intelligence governance for Indonesian banking]. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/Publikasi/Roadmap-dan-Pedoman/Perbankan/Pages/Tata-Kelola-Kecerdasan-Artifisial-Perbankan-Indonesia.aspx

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Rabbani, M. R., Khan, S., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2020). FinTech, blockchain and Islamic finance: An extensive literature review. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(2), 65–86.

Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x

Sehak, M. S., Abdullah, A., Mohd Salleh, M. Z., Nik Mayudin, N. A. S., & Abdullah, P. (2026). Harnessing AI for Islamic finance transformation: From compliance challenges to digital opportunities. Journal of Management and Muamalah, 16(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.53840/jmm.v16i1.323.

Setiawan, H., & Buchori, N. S. (2025). The implementation of artificial intelligence in zakat management institution: Advantages and challenges. Proceeding of the Annual International Conference on Islamic Economics and Business (AICIEB), 5, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.18326/aicieb.v5i-.786.

Shuib, M. S., Abd Muin, M. A., Mohd Noor, M. N., Mohamad, M. T., & Mansor, N. H. (2024). Digital payment transactions: Islamic finance perspective. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 36(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.36.2.1220

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

Syahmi, M. I., Harun, M. S., Ikhlas, M., Haqiem, S., & Mohd Azhar, M. H. (2026). Artificial intelligence in Islamic finance: An outlook based on maqasid al-shariah. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 31(2), 304–335. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no2.780.

Wahab, A., & Mahdiya, I. (2025). Digital Shariah governance and the future of Islamic finance: A framework for AI-driven Shariah compliance in a global regulatory environment. International Journal of Islamic Finance, 3(2), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijif.v3i2.2777.

Wahab, A., Mahdiya, I., & Afdhali, M. H. (2026). AI in enhancing zakat's role in collection and distribution: A model for digital transformation in Islamic philanthropy. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol5.iss1.art4.

Published

2026-11-10

How to Cite

Abd Muin, M. A., Che Omar, A., & Suginam, S. (2026). Issues and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Economic Development: Towards a Maqasid-Oriented Governance Framework. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer Dan Sains, 4(1), 68-80. Retrieved from https://prosiding.seminars.id/prosainteks/article/view/514